The right test management tool can mean the difference between catching bugs in your product or just uncovering flaws in your process. Explore 9 powerful Xray alternatives that bring clarity, speed, and alignment—giving your team focus and your stakeholders confidence to keep things moving.
By Testpad
April 16, 2025
Share this article
ray Test Management is known for its comprehensive features and Jira integration, and while may work for teams heavily invested in Jira’s ecosystem—but its complexity isn't for everyone.
Teams that value simplicity, flexibility, and pragmatism may find other tools better suited.
Luckily, the market is full of alternatives. From intuitive, checklist-driven approaches to tools designed specifically for agile workflows, there's no shortage of options to suit different styles of testing and team needs.
Xray Test Management is a Jira-native application built to streamline complex test case management, version control, and agile integration. As part of the Jira ecosystem, Xray enhances Jira’s core functionalities by enabling detailed visibility into testing processes, outcomes, and related issues.
Xray excels in large, agile-focused teams and enterprises already committed to Jira. Its advanced traceability and reporting features are particularly beneficial in highly regulated industries (like finance or healthcare) or for complex projects where documentation and audit trails are non-negotiable.
Teams deeply familiar with Jira benefit from Xray’s seamless integration, ensuring minimal disruption to established workflows. Xray is powerful, structured, and robust—qualities that suit large-scale, complex development environments.
Despite its strengths, Xray isn’t ideal for every team or scenario. Common challenges include:
When evaluating test management tools as alternatives to Xray, keep these key factors in mind:
There’s no one-size-fits-all in test management—tools that feel like a lifeline for one team can feel like a headache for another. Xray offers powerful Jira integration and comprehensive features, but if its complexity outweighs its advantages, looking into alternatives might make sense.
Below are a few solid alternatives to Xray, each with its own strengths, drawbacks, and unique spin on test management.
| Tool | Free trial | Basic plan price per year | Business plan price per year | Price per 10 users per month |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Xray Test Management | 30 days | Jira-dependent (from 1000+) | Jira-dependent (custom pricing) | $200+ (varies with Jira) |
| BrowserStack | Free tier | From $468 (manual) | From $2,388 (automation) | $390 (automation) |
| Zephyr Enterprise | Contact sales | Contact sales | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Tricentis qTest | 14 days | From $12,000 | Custom | 1,000 |
| PractiTest | 14 days | $4,680 | $5,880 | $390 |
| TestLink (Open-source) | N/A | Free (self-hosted) | Free (self-hosted) | Free |
| OpenText ALM | Contact sales | Custom pricing | Custom pricing | Custom |
| QMetry Test Management | Contact sales | Custom pricing | Custom pricing | Custom |
| Tuskr | 30 days | $1,080 | $2,400 | $90 |
| Testpad | 30 days | $588 (Essential - 3 testers) | $1,188 (Team - 10 testers, full features) | $99 |
BrowserStack specializes in running tests across multiple browsers and real devices. It’s particularly suited to teams that need to ensure their applications behave consistently, no matter where they're accessed.
Unlike Xray, BrowserStack best suits teams whose main priority is consistent cross-browser experiences rather than comprehensive Jira-based traceability. Teams already comfortable with Jira and primarily needing internal workflow management might lean toward Xray, whereas those prioritizing cross-browser testing might prefer BrowserStack.
Zephyr Enterprise is a Jira-friendly test management solution offering detailed insights and analytics across the testing lifecycle.
Zephyr and Xray share similar ground, both fitting neatly into Jira ecosystems. Zephyr suits Jira teams who prefer clear, digestible dashboards rather than the granular complexity of Xray.
Tricentis qTest caters specifically to agile teams that need to rapidly develop and adjust test cases alongside changing project requirements.
Tricentis qTest and Xray both work well for agile workflows. However, qTest specifically emphasizes flexibility and rapid adjustments in agile environments. Xray’s robust Jira integration may offer more depth for Jira-centric teams, while qTest could feel lighter and more flexible for those who want fewer Jira dependencies.
PractiTest offers a centralized solution for managing QA activities, aiming to simplify testing processes with clear visibility and customizable workflows.
PractiTest is particularly useful for mid-sized teams or organizations that want centralized QA management without relying on Jira. PractiTest’s approachable interface and adaptable workflows may appeal more to teams not fully committed to the Jira ecosystem, or those who simply prefer less complexity in their testing.
TestLink is an open-source test management application ideal for teams comfortable maintaining their own installations.
Unlike Xray, TestLink doesn't offer extensive Jira integrations out of the box. However, it provides foundational test management at no cost, making it appealing to teams comfortable with handling their infrastructure. If Xray’s cost and complexity pose issues—and your team has the technical expertise—TestLink could offer a simpler, cost-effective alternative.
Formerly known as Micro Focus ALM, OpenText Application Quality Management is an enterprise-level platform designed for complex projects, especially in regulated industries.
OpenText Application Quality Management is built for similar large-scale, regulated environments as Xray. However, it is even more heavily geared towards complete ALM processes rather than just testing. Smaller teams or agile-focused groups may find OpenText’s solution even more complex and expensive compared to Xray.
QMetry is an enterprise-level test management tool known for its advanced analytics, AI-enhanced capabilities, and deep integrations within the ALM space.
QMetry and Xray share a strong emphasis on integration and reporting. However, QMetry differentiates itself through explicit AI capabilities and deeper CI/CD integration options. Teams looking for advanced, predictive analytics and automated insights might find QMetry more attractive than Xray—but smaller teams might find both tools similarly overwhelming.
Tuskr positions itself as a budget-friendly test management solution suitable for small to medium-sized teams that need basic yet effective test management without overspending.
Tuskr's primary advantage over Xray is its affordability and simplicity. Smaller teams or those new to test management tools might find Tuskr more accessible and less intimidating. While it lacks the extensive integrations and complex lifecycle management that Xray provides, its simplicity and lower price point can be highly appealing.
Testpad offers a deliberately straightforward approach to test management by using intuitive checklists instead of complex test-case hierarchies. It’s intentionally designed to strip away unnecessary complexity, enabling any team member—technical or not—to quickly grasp the state of your software.
Both Testpad and Xray share the goal of supporting effective test management, but each takes a distinctly different approach. Xray provides extensive Jira integration, detailed traceability, and deep feature complexity, which suits highly regulated industries and larger teams. Testpad, on the other hand, deliberately streamlines testing to focus on clarity and ease of use, eliminating unnecessary complexity.
Where Xray prioritizes comprehensive lifecycle management and robust integration within Jira, Testpad emphasizes simplicity, rapid onboarding, and practical features designed specifically to enhance productivity without steep learning curves.
Testpad excels for teams that value straightforward, practical testing processes:
Testpad offers affordable pricing with plans designed to scale based on team size:
Testpad offers clear, predictable pricing designed to scale with your team, compared to Xray’s Jira-dependent pricing structure, which can fluctuate based on Jira license requirements.
When evaluating test management tools, consider which factors genuinely matter to your team: Do you value comprehensive Jira integrations, or would simplicity better serve your workflows? Reflecting honestly on your team’s actual testing needs—rather than aspirational complexity—can clarify your choice.
If Xray’s complexity seems more than your team realistically needs, exploring simpler, checklist-based options like Testpad might be worthwhile. A free 30-day trial can help teams quickly see if it’s a good fit.
Testpad uses a checklist-based approach designed for simplicity and easy adoption, compared to Xray’s more comprehensive and Jira-centric design.
Testpad primarily focuses on manual test management. However, an API for integrating automated test results is currently under development, enabling teams to complement their manual tests with automation in the near future.
Yes. Testpad’s guest testing feature enables non-technical users and stakeholders to participate easily in User Acceptance Testing without needing an account.
Testpad maintains robust security measures, including HTTPS/TLS encryption, encrypted data storage, hourly backups, regular penetration testing by external security experts, and strict firewall protections—ensuring your data stays safe and secure.
Yes. Testpad integrates smoothly with popular bug-tracking systems, including Jira, GitHub, GitLab, and more—streamlining your test-to-issue workflows.
Testpad offers transparent, affordable pricing starting at $49/month, scaling predictably with team size. By comparison, Xray’s cost depends heavily on Jira licensing, which can quickly become expensive or complicated, especially for smaller teams.
If you liked this article, consider sharing
EDITORIALS
Spreadsheets are often where teams start their testing. It's a great option that most people already know how to use, but can quickly become something your team outgrows. It might be that you're ready for an upgrade, but with so many tools on the market, where do you start?
EDITORIALS
Exploratory testing tools help teams test more effectively by combining creative freedom with structured workflows. Finding the right tool can be overwhelming, so here are 9 tools that will help improve your software quality.
EDITORIALS
Testing reveals how your software truly works. It's not about chasing down every single bug or verifying every line of code. Instead, testing gives your team real insight into the software’s current state, empowering smarter choices about your next move.