EDITORIALS

Exploratory testing techniques: A practical guide

Image of scientists in a lab, with someone testing robotic legs.

Exploratory testing techniques: A practical guide

Exploratory testing techniques aren’t strict steps but flexible approaches – there to give your testing enough structure to stay on track, without killing the freedom (or fun) of exploring.

Pheobe

By Pheobe

August 29, 2025

Linkedin Logo Twitter Logo Facebook Logo
w

ith testing, you get a clear way to explore how software behaves, helping you uncover issues that scripted tests often miss. These approaches help you spot risks earlier, adapt as you go, and ultimately ask smarter questions about the product.

The best exploratory testing happens when you have trusted techniques to draw on – practical ways of thinking that sharpen your instincts and help you follow the most promising leads. Whether you’re starting out or looking to refine your skills, these exploratory testing techniques will help you find more problems, faster.

Techniques to use when exploratory testing

Exploratory testing is about learning, designing tests, and running them at the same time. The best techniques aren’t exclusive to exploratory testing – but they work especially well here because they help you think quickly and adjust as you see how the software actually works.

The main difference is flexibility. In exploratory testing, techniques give you the freedom to find issues quicker and more naturally, while still keeping enough structure to stay on track.

Here are a few techniques you can lean on to guide your exploratory sessions, without losing the freedom that makes this style of testing so effective.

Boundary value analysis

Test the limits of what your software accepts (i.e. push it to the edge). Instead of only trying normal values, focus on the edges where problems are most likely.

How to use it in exploratory testing:

  • When you see an input field, immediately test its boundaries.
  • If “age” accepts “25,” try -1, 0, 1, and 100, 150, 999.
  • Watch for off-by-one errors, buffer overflows, and validation failures.
  • Follow interesting behavior – if 999 causes an error, try 998, 1000, 9999.

Example: Testing a file upload, you see it accepts a 5MB file. You test 4.9MB, 5MB, and 5.1MB. The 5.1MB file uploads but breaks the preview – an issue you wouldn’t find testing only normal sizes.

Equivalence partitioning

Group similar test conditions to focus on areas that might behave differently instead of repeating the same checks.

How to use it in exploratory testing:

  • Identify groups of inputs that should behave the same.
  • Test one example from each group thoroughly, then spot-check others.
  • Use saved time to explore more scenarios.
  • If Safari behaves like Chrome, test Chrome in depth and quickly check Safari.

Example: Testing an e-commerce discount system, instead of checking ages 66, 67, 68 for senior discounts, test one from each bracket: 30 (no discount), 65 (boundary), 70 (senior), 90 (very senior). This finds a failure for ages above 99.

Error guessing

Use your experience and trust your gut on areas where problems usually happen.This technique gets stronger as you learn the system.

How to use it in exploratory testing:

  • Focus on areas that caused trouble before.
  • Look for common failure patterns (file uploads, forms, payments).
  • Test scenarios developers might not consider.
  • Follow your instincts when something seems off.

Example: Testing a new feature, you notice the save button sometimes lags. Based on experience, you test rapid clicks, concurrent saves, and network interruptions. You find a race condition that only happens in specific timing conditions.

Mind mapping for comprehensive coverage

Start with main features and branch out to related areas, making sure you don’t miss important tests while staying flexible.

How to use it in exploratory testing:

  • Begin with core features at the center.
  • Branch out to edge cases, integrations, and user scenarios.
  • Use it for planning, not strict execution – follow discoveries.
  • Update the map as you learn more about the system.

Example: Mind mapping a login system reveals connections you hadn’t considered – password reset links to email delivery, which links to spam filters, showing the need to test different email providers.

State transition testing

Look at how features behave as they move between states, focusing on transitions that typical tests might miss.

How to use it in exploratory testing:

  • Map possible states (draft, submitted, approved, rejected).
  • Test transitions, especially unusual ones.
  • See if you can get the system into unexpected states.
  • Check what happens if transitions are interrupted.

Real example: Testing document approval, you discover editing a document in multiple browser tabs while it’s “being reviewed” corrupts the approval process.

Use case testing

Follow realistic user workflows rather than isolated features to find integration and usability issues.

How to use it in exploratory testing:

  • Think like a real user, not just a tester.
  • Follow full workflows from start to finish.
  • Notice friction points and confusing interactions.
  • Test scenarios users actually face, not just happy paths.

Example: Testing a new customer’s first purchase, you find the shopping cart doesn’t save items if a user creates an account mid-checkout – a critical issue only found with realistic testing.

Heuristic-based testing

Use frameworks to make sure you cover everything while staying flexible. Heuristics are structured ways to guide testing without strict scripts. Basically, it’s about using a set of prompts or mental checklists to make sure you don’t miss anything important, without having to write out every single step.

Common heuristic frameworks:

  • SFDPOT: Structure, Function, Data, Platform, Operations, Time
  • CRISP-DM: Different aspects of data handling
  • User experience heuristics: Consistency, feedback, error prevention

How to use it in exploratory testing:

  • Pick a heuristic that fits your testing.
  • Use it as a mental checklist, not a strict sequence.
  • Let each heuristic suggest areas to explore.
  • Combine heuristics as new discoveries lead you to more tests.

Example: Using SFDPOT, the “Time” part prompts testing during daylight saving changes. You find scheduled reports fail when clocks fall back because the system tries to generate the same report twice.

Mixing techniques effectively

The real power of exploratory testing comes from mixing these techniques as you go. You might start with boundary value analysis on a form field, spot an unusual error message that triggers error guessing, then follow that lead into use case testing to see how it affects real user workflows.

What this looks like in practice: Testing a search feature, you try boundary value analysis (empty searches, very long terms) and find searches over 256 characters fail silently. Error guessing suggests a buffer limit, so you check related features and see the same problem in user comments. Use case testing shows that users copying long text from elsewhere often hit this limit, making it a serious usability issue.

Balance freedom with just enough structure

Techniques give you flexibility, but some structure keeps your testing manageable and traceable. The trick is balancing organization with adaptability – enough to track progress and report results without losing exploratory freedom.

Testpad's pragmatic approach handles this with simple test prompts instead of detailed scripts. Prompts like "check password complexity" or "verify account lockout" become mini-explorations where you apply whichever techniques make sense. This approach:

  • Let's you capture discoveries without breaking your flow
  • Keeps progress visible to stakeholders
  • Turns insights into future prompts
  • Uses techniques to guide exploration rather than constrain it

Getting started with exploratory testing techniques

Exploratory testing can feel overwhelming at first, even more so with all the jargon around it. But you don’t need to overthink it – the key is to just start small and build from there.

Start simple: Pick one or two techniques that resonate with you and practice applying them consistently. Boundary value analysis and error guessing are great starting points because they're intuitive and immediately useful.

Build technique awareness: As you gain experience, consciously expand your toolkit. When you're stuck or feeling like you're missing something, try a different technique to shift your perspective.

Trust your judgment: These techniques guide investigation, but your experience and intuition determine which ones to apply when. The goal is systematic thinking, not mechanical execution.

Capture what works: Note which techniques reveal the most valuable issues in your context. Different applications and teams will find different approaches most effective.

A tool to support exploratory testing

Exploratory testing techniques give you a flexible, systematic way to test software without being tied to rigid scripts. They’re thinking tools that help you ask sharper questions, follow promising paths, and uncover issues that scripted testing often misses.

The best results come when you have these techniques at your fingertips and the judgment to apply them fluidly as your investigation unfolds. Paired with just enough structure to stay organized, they make your testing more effective, insightful, and manageable.

This is where tools matter. A lightweight checklist-style tool like Testpad gives you just enough structure – test prompts instead of scripts – so you can capture discoveries, track progress, and keep stakeholders in the loop without slowing yourself down. If you want to try it for yourself, there’s a free 30-day trial waiting – no card needed.

Green square with white check

If you liked this article, consider sharing

Linkedin Logo Twitter Logo Facebook Logo

Subscribe to receive pragmatic strategies and starter templates straight to your inbox

no spams. unsubscribe anytime.