A test strategy is not as scary as it sounds – it’s just your high-level plan for learning whether your software actually works before your users find out it doesn't.
By Pheobe
September 16, 2025
Share this article
test strategy is your approach to learning enough about your software to ship with confidence. It's the high-level decisions about how you'll discover what's working, what's broken, and what needs attention before release – and should be in place to keep your team on track and make the whole process more efficient.
Think of it as your game plan for uncovering the truth about your software's quality. It’s about making practical decisions: what to test, how to test, and how much testing is “enough” before you hit deploy.
The goal is straightforward: find the most effective way to figure out if your software works well enough to release. Everything else – the specific tests, tools, and tactics – flows from those strategic choices. Unlike a test plan, which lists the exact tests you’ll run for a release, your strategy is the big-picture approach that guides those plans.
A clear test strategy is like a coach’s playbook: it makes sure your team uses their time on the field wisely, avoids leaving gaps in defense, and keeps the ball from slipping past into the wrong hands.
But search for “test strategy in software testing” and you’ll be buried under sample documents, strategy templates, and guides full of sections on risk analysis, entry criteria, exit criteria and dozens of other formal elements.
The thing is, if you’re asking “what is a test strategy?” you probably don’t need all that complexity. You need to make some practical decisions about how to spend your limited testing time effectively. Most teams freeze up trying to design the “perfect” strategy document. But the best strategy isn’t the one that looks impressive – it’s the one you actually use.
The terms get used inconsistently, so let’s clear it up.
Test strategy is the big picture. Your overall philosophy and approach: how you’re going to tackle testing across your project or product.
Test plan is the specifics. The actual list of tests you’ll run for a release. (Though confusingly, some teams use “test plan” to mean the whole strategy – no wonder it gets messy.) Haven’t written a test plan before? Read our blog post on how to write your first Test Plan.
Concrete example: Test strategy = focus testing on critical user journeys. Test plan = in this release, test checkout, account creation, and refunds.
Think of strategy as answering "how do we approach testing?" and the plan as answering "what exactly will we test this time?"
When thinking about what should be in your test strategy, the components come down to a few key decisions:
What types of testing will you do? Manual testing to explore user experiences and spot unexpected issues. Automated tests to catch problems early. Regression testing to make sure fixed bugs stay fixed.
How will you balance manual and automated approaches? Automation is great for repetitive checks, but don’t assume “automation-first.” Your strategy should plan for manual testing as a key tactic – it brings human intuition, creativity, and adaptability.
Where will you focus your limited resources? You can't test everything, so decide what matters most based on user impact, business risk, and likelihood of problems.
Who will actually do the testing? Ideally, people who didn't write the code. They test according to how users might actually use the system rather than how developers imagined it.
Getting a grip on these components makes sure your test strategy is actionable and helps your team focus on key areas rather than trying to cover everything.
A lot of automation-first strategies miss the fact that human testers catch things that scripts can't. Humans notice when something feels clunky, they can react to unexpected behavior, and explore paths that weren't planned.
Manual testing, especially exploratory testing, is a powerful tactic because it lets testers:
This doesn't mean avoiding automation. It means planning for manual testing as an essential part of your overall approach rather than a second class citizen to automation. Often, it’s the fastest way to learn – and it saves you from spending hours maintaining automated scripts that only catch the obvious problems.
There’s no point wasting weeks designing the “perfect” test strategy document. When it comes to software testing, a test strategy that stays practical and flexible enough to evolve with your product should be fairly easy to implement. Just remember to:
Tip: Think of your strategy as a living thing, not a dusty PDF. It’s there to guide testing, not slow it down.
Copy-paste strategies from the internet rarely work. Every team has different constraints and risks. Think about:
The “best” strategy for you might look nothing like the big frameworks you find online, and that’s exactly right.
A fit-for-purpose, practical software test strategy benefits from a tool to match. If your strategy is flexible, manual-friendly, and focused on real learning, you don’t want a system that bogs you down with unnecessary fields, forms, or processes.
Testpad is a checklist-style, manual test management tool that gives you just enough structure to stay organized, whether you’re doing exploratory testing, following structured steps, or a mix of both. It keeps your team on track without forcing steps or processes your strategy doesn’t need.
It’s a bit like a test strategy template that can effortlessly adapt to the way your team works. It’s easy to pick up, easy to adapt, and there to help you implement your strategy. Everything in Testpad is there to support the decisions you’ve made in your strategy, so your testing is effective, efficient, and aligned with your team’s goals.
Why not trial Testpad free for 30 days and see how it works in practice? No card needed.
If you liked this article, consider sharing
EDITORIALS
Your QA strategy isn’t about picking between automated or manual testing. It’s about using the right blend of tools and techniques to actually learn what your product does — before your users do. That’s where exploratory testing comes in.
EDITORIALS
Traditional test case management tools can be unnecessarily complicated, but what if there’s a simpler, more effective solution? Agile tools offer a more streamlined, pragmatic approach, allowing teams to focus on efficient testing rather than getting bogged down by complex systems - but what is the difference?
EDITORIALS
First it was automation threatening to replace manual testing – though it didn’t – and now it’s AI we’re worried about. But this thinking misses how human insight and AI can actually work well together.